Amazing Output From My Yam-in-sack Farming (pictures)
4 analysed pages ·
open on Nairaland ↗
market_access_offtakers · 3knowledge_transfer · 2feed_formulation · 2youth_in_agricultureinsecurity_herdsmenseed_stem_sourcingsoil_manurestorage_post_harvestprofitability_claimshousing_equipment
page 0 · 32 posts · 8 participants
· promo_listing
This page is a promotional thread where the original poster advertises 'yam-in-sack' farming as a low-cost, high-yield business opportunity for Nigerians, including NYSC members and job seekers. While the OP provides detailed comparisons and parameters for the method, the thread functions primarily as a showcase for their specific technique rather than a general discussion of agricultural themes or a collaborative effort.
Credibility signals:
posts_photoscites_years_of_experience
“God bless the individual that unveiled the idea of yam-in-sack farming. I put up my first trial, the result is amazing.”
“You can get your produce in 7/8months as against the normal 10/11months”
“Soil is platform for seed germination. In recent time, plants are grown without soil.”
page 1 · 30 posts · 23 participants
· discussion_qa
This thread centers on a user showcasing their successful yam-in-sack farming experiment and providing a business case analysis, which sparked a discussion on profitability, scalability, and suitability for different regions. While the main post functions as a success story, the replies reveal significant concerns about land theft by herdsmen, the high cost of inputs relative to returns, and logistical questions regarding seedling sourcing for large-scale operations.
Pain points:
stolen_harvestfeed_too_expensive
Prices:
seed yam: NGN200.0 (n/a)sack: NGN50.0 (n/a)yam: NGN800.0 (n/a)
Credibility signals:
posting_picturesciting_specific_costs_and_returnsnaming_farm_size
“Imagine the hidden profits if one could invest hugely in yam in sack farming”
“This seems like a lot of work just for about 100k payoff in 8 months. It's not as if you just planted and abandoned.”
“The Purpose of reading is to understand, but you always read to criticize.”
failed
page 2 · 32 posts · 28 participants
· discussion_qa
This thread is a Q&A discussion where users react to an OP's successful yam-in-sack farming photos, asking specific technical questions about input costs, fertilization methods, and storage. The conversation reveals a mix of skepticism regarding the economics of sack farming versus traditional heap methods, with users debating input prices and seeking practical advice on scaling up.
Pain points:
feed_too_expensiveinput_adulteration
Prices:
yam seeds (tubers): NGN10000.0 (here)yam heap (average): NGN5.0 (northern part of the country)yam heap (very big): NGN20.0 (northern part of the country)
Credibility signals:
visual_evidencespecific_production_details
“Too expensive, maybe because of your location.”
“I think going for sacs is too expensive and less productive.”
“This must be the northern part of the country. I cannot imagine #20 per heap in any other part of the country.”
Unclassified: The thread contains some banter and slang (e.g., 'Alternative farmer no be moi moi work', 'You're a sadist') which does not fit the agricultural themes.
page 3 · 21 posts · 7 participants
· discussion_qa
This page is a discussion thread where a user shares results from yam-in-sack farming, prompting others to ask about specific techniques like tyre stacking and discuss production costs. The conversation focuses on the viability of the method, with users expressing skepticism about the output and noting the importance of factoring in contingencies for total production costs.
Credibility signals:
sharing_visual_evidencereferencing_video_content
“Try 1k of this and you would understand that shit is not cool.”
“Indeed... contingencies must be factored into the total cost of production.”
“How many tyres did you stack together?”
Unclassified: The thread revolves around a specific farming technique (yam in sack) using tyres as containers, with discussions on yield potential and cost management.